Tagembed and Curator are both popular tools for adding social media content to your website, but they serve slightly different needs. This simple comparison will help you decide which suits your business better.
What Tagembed and Curator Do
Both Tagembed and Curator are social media aggregators. They collect posts, photos, videos, and reviews from platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, and more, then display them on your website as a social media widget. This helps you show live social proof, campaigns, and user-generated content without manual updates.
Tagembed is a no‑code, budget‑friendly solution with a wide range of widget types for social feeds, videos, and reviews. Curator highlights simplicity and clean design, with a strong free plan for basic social feeds.
Sources and Widget Types
Tagembed supports over 20 sources, including Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X, YouTube, TikTok, Vimeo, Pinterest, Google Reviews, Airbnb reviews, Medium, and RSS feeds. You can build one social media widget that mixes posts, videos, and reviews from several platforms in a single feed.
Curator lets you connect major networks such as Facebook, Instagram, X, YouTube, TikTok, LinkedIn, Tumblr, Flickr, Reddit, Yelp, RSS, and Google Reviews. It focuses on streamlined social and content feeds with strong design control via HTML/CSS rather than iframes.
For a dedicated YouTube or Facebook widget, Tagembed leans heavily on ready‑made templates and layouts, while Curator offers more granular control if you are comfortable styling with CSS.
Ease of Use and Setup
Tagembed is designed for non‑developers. You pick a source, customize the look, and paste an embed code into your site or CMS (WordPress, Shopify, Wix, etc.). The interface and presets make it quick to get a working feed without touching code.
Curator is also easy to start with—its free social media aggregator promise is “set up your feed in under 5 minutes.” However, it emphasizes embedding JavaScript/HTML/CSS instead of iframes, so front‑end developers can fully match the site’s design. This is great if you want pixel‑perfect control, but less necessary if you prefer plug‑and‑play.
Design and Customization
Tagembed offers multiple ready-made layouts (grid, carousel, masonry, slider, sidebar) and design controls, plus custom CSS options, through its plugin and app. This makes it easy to build branded social proof sections, video galleries, or review strips with minimal design effort.
Curator provides templates but is exceptionally flexible when styled via your own CSS, since the feed is rendered directly in your code rather than inside an iframe. This is ideal if your team already manages front‑end styling and wants complete control over fonts, spacing, and animations.
Analytics and Moderation
Both tools support moderation, so you can hide unwanted or off‑brand posts. That is important when you are embedding user‑generated content.
Tagembed adds more marketing‑focused features, such as basic social media analytics for impressions and engagement, along with options for review widgets, shoppable galleries, and mixed feeds. That makes it more attractive if you care about measuring how your embedded social content performs within your funnel.
Curator’s focus is on giving you a clean, curated feed; its professional plan includes moderation and customization features, but it is less positioned as a complete analytics product.
Pricing
Curator offers a generous free plan for simple feeds, with paid plans for more sources, higher post limits, and advanced features. It is a good starting point if you want a basic embedded feed with minimal cost.
Tagembed is often seen as more budget‑friendly when you consider the number of widget types and sources included in the basic plans, especially for small businesses needing several feeds (social, video, reviews) under one login. If you want to run a YouTube widget, a Facebook widget, review feeds, and more together, Tagembed usually gives better overall value.
When to Choose Tagembed
Tagembed is a strong choice if you:
- Want an easy, no‑code way to add multiple social feeds and review feeds?
- Need different widget types (social media widget for posts, video gallery, review slider, etc.).
- Care about social media analytics and marketing features in the same tool.
It suits marketers, small businesses, and agencies that want a fast setup, multiple sources, and ready‑made designs.
When to Choose Curator
Curator is a good fit if you:
- Need a simple, clean social feed with a solid free tier.
- Prefer embedding content directly as HTML/CSS for more developer‑level control.
- Want a focused social feed without too many extra marketing features.
It suits teams with front‑end resources and projects where design control matters more than extra widgets and add‑ons.
Final Thoughts
Both Tagembed and Curator are reliable social media aggregator tools that can power a flexible social media widget on your website. Tagembed leans toward all‑in‑one marketing use cases with more sources, templates, and light social media analytics. Curator leans toward clean, developer‑friendly feeds with substantial control over how everything looks in your own code.
If you want plug‑and‑play widgets for many networks, including a YouTube widget, a Facebook widget, and review feeds, Tagembed is likely the better option. If you want a lean, customizable feed that your development team can style in depth, Curator may be the right choice.
The Social Media Widget - SMW Blogs 
Leave a comment